Abstract
Specification of “standing” – whose benefits and costs should be counted – is a crucial step in a Cost–Benefit Analysis. If it is omitted, some relevant costs and benefits may be excluded, or, conversely, wrongly included. The textbook formulation for standing is “the whole of society” for a country, but the literature is virtually silent on the issue at a sub-national or regional level. A strictly state or regional standing can be a problem within federated countries such as Australia or the USA due to conceptual inconsistencies and resulting inefficiencies. On balance, a national perspective is to be preferred, at least as a default option.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 156-166 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Economic Papers |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2019 |