Delayed Versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants

William Tarnow-Mordi, Jonathan Morris, Adrienne Kirby, Kristy Robledo, Lisa Askie, Rebecca Brown, Nicholas Evans, Sarah Finlayson, Michael Fogarty, Val Gebski, Alpana Ghadge, Wendy Hague, David Isaacs, Michelle Jeffery, Anthony Keech, Martin Kluckow, Himanshu Popat, Lucille Sebastian, Kjersti Aagaard, Michael BelfortMohan Pammi, Mohamed Abdel-Latif, Graham Reynolds, Shabina Ariff, Lumaan Sheikh, Yan Chen, Paul Colditz, Helen Liley, Margo Pritchard, Daniele De Luca, Koert De Waal, Peta Forder, Lelia Duley, Walid El-Naggar, Andrew Gill, John Newnham, Karen Simmer, Katie Groom, Philip Weston, Joanna Gullam, Harshad Patel, Guan Koh, Kei Lui, Neil Marlow, Scott Morris, Arvind Sehgal, Euan Wallace, Roger Soll, Leslie Young, David Sweet, Susan Walker, Andrew Watkins, Ian Wright, David Osborn, John Simes

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Systemic reviews have shown that delaying the time of umbilical cord clamping can improve outcomes of preterm newborns. One such study found enhanced placental transfusion through delayed cord clamping, cord-palpation, or a combination of the 2 practices caused a lower infection and mortality rate when compared with immediate clamping.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)265-266
    Number of pages2
    JournalObstetrical and Gynecological Survey
    Volume73
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Delayed Versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this