Deliberative democracy in divided societies: Alternatives to agonism and analgesia

John S. Dryzek*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    331 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    For contemporary democratic theorists, democracy is largely a matter of deliberation. But the recent rise of deliberative democracy (in practice as well as theory) coincided with ever more prominent identity politics, sometimes in murderous form in deeply divided societies. This essay considers how deliberative democracy can process the toughest issues concerning mutually contradictory assertions of identity. After considering the alternative answers provided by agonists and consociational democrats, the author makes the case for a power-sharing state with attenuated sovereignty and a more engaged deliberative politics in a public sphere that is semidetached from the state and situated transnationally.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)218-242
    Number of pages25
    JournalPolitical Theory
    Volume33
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Deliberative democracy in divided societies: Alternatives to agonism and analgesia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this