Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics

Robert E. Goodin*, John S. Dryzek

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    654 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Democratic theorists often place deliberative innovations such as citizen's panels, consensus conferences, planning cells, and deliberative polls at the center of their hopes for deliberative democratization. In light of experience to date, the authors chart the ways in which such mini-publics may have an impact in the "macro" world of politics. Impact may come in the form of actually making policy, being taken up in the policy process, informing public debates, market-testing of proposals, legitimation of public policies, building confidence and constituencies for policies, popular oversight, and resisting co-option. Exposing problems and failures is all too easy. The authors highlight cases of success on each of these dimensions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)219-244
    Number of pages26
    JournalPolitics and Society
    Volume34
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this