TY - JOUR
T1 - Delirium in advanced cancer
T2 - Screening for the incidence on admission to an inpatient hospice unit
AU - Rainsford, Suzanne
AU - Rosenberg, John P.
AU - Bullen, Tracey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2014/9/1
Y1 - 2014/9/1
N2 - Background: Delirium is a common underdiagnosed condition in advanced cancer leading to increased distress, morbidity, and mortality. Screening improves detection but there is no consensus as to the best screening tool to use with patients with advanced cancer. Objective: To determine the incidence of delirium in patients with advanced cancer within 72 hours of admission to an acute inpatient hospice using clinical judgement and validated screening tools. Method: One hundred consecutive patients with advanced cancer were invited to be screened for delirium within 72 hours of admission to an acute inpatient hospice unit. Two validated tools were used, the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised 98 (DRS-R-98) and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) shortened diagnostic algorithm. These results were compared with clinical assessment by review of medical charts. Results: Of 100 consecutive admissions 51 participated and of these 22 (43.1%) screened positive for delirium with CAM and/or DRS-R-98 compared to 15 (29.4%) by clinical assessment. Eleven (21.6%) were identified as hypoactive delirium and 5 (9.8%) as subsyndromal delirium. Conclusion: This study confirms that delirium is a common condition in patients with advanced cancer. While there remains a lack of consensus regarding the choice of delirium screening tool this study supports the CAM as being appropriate. Further research may determine the optimal screening tool for delirium enabling the development of best practice clinical guidelines for routine medical practice.
AB - Background: Delirium is a common underdiagnosed condition in advanced cancer leading to increased distress, morbidity, and mortality. Screening improves detection but there is no consensus as to the best screening tool to use with patients with advanced cancer. Objective: To determine the incidence of delirium in patients with advanced cancer within 72 hours of admission to an acute inpatient hospice using clinical judgement and validated screening tools. Method: One hundred consecutive patients with advanced cancer were invited to be screened for delirium within 72 hours of admission to an acute inpatient hospice unit. Two validated tools were used, the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised 98 (DRS-R-98) and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) shortened diagnostic algorithm. These results were compared with clinical assessment by review of medical charts. Results: Of 100 consecutive admissions 51 participated and of these 22 (43.1%) screened positive for delirium with CAM and/or DRS-R-98 compared to 15 (29.4%) by clinical assessment. Eleven (21.6%) were identified as hypoactive delirium and 5 (9.8%) as subsyndromal delirium. Conclusion: This study confirms that delirium is a common condition in patients with advanced cancer. While there remains a lack of consensus regarding the choice of delirium screening tool this study supports the CAM as being appropriate. Further research may determine the optimal screening tool for delirium enabling the development of best practice clinical guidelines for routine medical practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907016751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2013.0646
DO - 10.1089/jpm.2013.0646
M3 - Article
SN - 1096-6218
VL - 17
SP - 1045
EP - 1048
JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine
JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine
IS - 9
ER -