Democracy and scandal: A research agenda

Jensen Sass, Thomas Crosbie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent edition of this journal, Scott Brenton (2012) announced a refreshing perspective on the relationship between political scandal and liberal democratic institutions: though scandals are often thought anathema to democratic politics, a cause of public distraction or a sign of institutional degradation, their effect may actually be to reinforce and rejuvenate the polity. We consolidate and then challenge this perspective. We begin by reconstructing Brenton's observations on scandal as a process model which we term the "scandal reform cycle". We then suggest a raft of challenges to the model to reveal the complexity of scandals and their uncertain institutional effects. Our larger ambition is to articulate the relationship between scandal and democracy not as a simple question but rather as an ambitious and timely research agenda.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)851-862
Number of pages12
JournalComparative Sociology
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Democracy and scandal: A research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this