Demographic and clinical predictors of vitamin D status in pregnant women tested for deficiency in Western Australia

Kate M. Miller*, Nick H.de Klerk, Elizabeth A. Davis, Robyn M. Lucas, Prue H. Hart, Aveni Haynes

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: This study aimed to describe the vitamin D status of pregnant women in Western Australia and identify predictors of deficiency in pregnancy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using linked data from statewide administrative data collections. Participants included pregnant women aged 18–44 years who gave birth between 2012 and 2014. Results: The mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration was 70.7 nmol L−1 (SD 25.7; range 5–255 nmol L−1). Approximately one-fifth of the pregnant women were vitamin D deficient (<50 nmol L−1). Maternal age (under 25 years) was identified as an independent risk factor of vitamin D deficiency in addition to known predictors. Only 20% of women were screened within the first 10 weeks of their pregnancy. Conclusions: In addition to the existing risk factors for deficiency, maternal age was an independent predictor of vitamin D deficiency. There was a large discrepancy between the time of first antenatal visit and screening for vitamin D deficiency. Implications for public health: Our findings support the addition of maternal age (under 25 years) to the current clinical guidelines for targeted screening of 25(OH)D levels in pregnancy and the practical application of screening for vitamin D deficiency at the first antenatal visit.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)474-481
    Number of pages8
    JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
    Volume45
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Demographic and clinical predictors of vitamin D status in pregnant women tested for deficiency in Western Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this