Deontological decision theory and agent-centered options

Deontologists have long been upbraided for lacking an account of justified decisionmaking under risk and uncertainty. One response is to develop a deontological decision theory-a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for an act’s being permissible given an agent’s imperfect information. In this article, I show that deontologists can make more use of regular decision theory than some might have thought, but that we must adapt decision theory to accommodate agentcentered options-permissions to favor or sacrifice our own interests, when doing so is overall morally worse. Accommodating options requires more than just amending the decision-theoretic ‘value function’. We must change the decision rule as well.