TY - JOUR
T1 - Design in mind
T2 - Eliciting service user and frontline staff perspectives on psychiatric ward design through participatory methods
AU - Csipke, Emese
AU - Papoulias, Constantina
AU - Vitoratou, Silia
AU - Williams, Paul
AU - Rose, Diana
AU - Wykes, Til
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author(s).
PY - 2016/3/3
Y1 - 2016/3/3
N2 - Background: Psychiatric ward design may make an important contribution to patient outcomes and well-being. However, research is hampered by an inability to assess its effects robustly. This paper reports on a study which deployed innovative methods to capture service user and staff perceptions of ward design.Method: User generated measures of the impact of ward design were developed and tested on four acute adult wards using participatory methodology. Additionally, inpatients took photographs to illustrate their experience of the space in two wards. Data were compared across wards.Results: Satisfactory reliability indices emerged based on both service user and staff responses. Black and minority ethnic (BME) service users and those with a psychosis spectrum diagnosis have more positive views of the ward layout and fixtures. Staff members have more positive views than service users, while priorities of staff and service users differ. Inpatient photographs prioritise hygiene, privacy and control and address symbolic aspects of the ward environment.Conclusions: Participatory and visual methodologies can provide robust tools for an evaluation of the impact of psychiatric ward design on users.
AB - Background: Psychiatric ward design may make an important contribution to patient outcomes and well-being. However, research is hampered by an inability to assess its effects robustly. This paper reports on a study which deployed innovative methods to capture service user and staff perceptions of ward design.Method: User generated measures of the impact of ward design were developed and tested on four acute adult wards using participatory methodology. Additionally, inpatients took photographs to illustrate their experience of the space in two wards. Data were compared across wards.Results: Satisfactory reliability indices emerged based on both service user and staff responses. Black and minority ethnic (BME) service users and those with a psychosis spectrum diagnosis have more positive views of the ward layout and fixtures. Staff members have more positive views than service users, while priorities of staff and service users differ. Inpatient photographs prioritise hygiene, privacy and control and address symbolic aspects of the ward environment.Conclusions: Participatory and visual methodologies can provide robust tools for an evaluation of the impact of psychiatric ward design on users.
KW - Inpatient services
KW - participatory methodology
KW - psychiatric ward design
KW - service user involvement
KW - service-user perceptions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961201857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/09638237.2016.1139061
DO - 10.3109/09638237.2016.1139061
M3 - Article
SN - 0963-8237
VL - 25
SP - 114
EP - 121
JO - Journal of Mental Health
JF - Journal of Mental Health
IS - 2
ER -