Designing reusable online clinical reasoning templates: A preliminary evaluation

Helen Wozniak*, Mark Hancock, Joanne Munn, Gosia Mendrela

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

As increasing resources are devoted to the production of online learning materials it is important that both the usability of such resources by educators and the educational usefulness of these resources for student learning are evaluated. Outcomes from such evaluations provide information that can be used to inform future development of online learning materials. This paper describes two clinical reasoning templates that were developed to enable easy incorporation of content materials by educators without specialist web design skills, and easy access to the materials by students with minimal software requirements. Preliminary evaluation data will be presented describing the usability of the templates by educators and students.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
Subtitle of host publicationWho's Learning? Whose Technology?, ASCILITE 2006
Pages915-919
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes
Event23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education - "Who's Learning? Whose Technology?" - ASCILITE 2006 - Sydney, NSW, Australia
Duration: 3 Dec 20066 Dec 2006

Publication series

NameASCILITE 2006 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
Volume2

Conference

Conference23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education - "Who's Learning? Whose Technology?" - ASCILITE 2006
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CitySydney, NSW
Period3/12/066/12/06

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Designing reusable online clinical reasoning templates: A preliminary evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this