Determinants of self-rated health items with different points of reference: Implications for health measurement of older adults

Kerry A. Sargent-Cox, Kaarin J. Anstey, Mary A. Luszcz

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    65 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: This study assessed whether three commonly used self-rated health (SRH) items (global, age-comparative, and self-comparative) are equivalent measures of health perception for older adults. Method: Regression analyses were used to simultaneously contrast the associations between physical, psychological, and social factors relating to health for three SRH items, in a large ( N = 2,034) population-based sample of older adults (65 years and older) from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging. Results: Health perceptions were more positive for the age-comparative SRH measure, compared to the pessimistic ratings of the self-comparative measure, particularly for the oldest-old adults. Different patterns of associations between the health factors and SRH measures were found. Discussion: These results show the three SRH items are not equivalent measures of health and cannot be used interchangeably. The reference point of the SRH item has a considerable influence on health perceptions of older adults as it encapsulates unique health information.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)739-761
    Number of pages23
    JournalJournal of Aging and Health
    Volume20
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of self-rated health items with different points of reference: Implications for health measurement of older adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this