Abstract
Objective: This study assessed whether three commonly used self-rated health (SRH) items (global, age-comparative, and self-comparative) are equivalent measures of health perception for older adults. Method: Regression analyses were used to simultaneously contrast the associations between physical, psychological, and social factors relating to health for three SRH items, in a large ( N = 2,034) population-based sample of older adults (65 years and older) from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging. Results: Health perceptions were more positive for the age-comparative SRH measure, compared to the pessimistic ratings of the self-comparative measure, particularly for the oldest-old adults. Different patterns of associations between the health factors and SRH measures were found. Discussion: These results show the three SRH items are not equivalent measures of health and cannot be used interchangeably. The reference point of the SRH item has a considerable influence on health perceptions of older adults as it encapsulates unique health information.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 739-761 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Journal of Aging and Health |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2008 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of self-rated health items with different points of reference: Implications for health measurement of older adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver