Deterrence, coping styles and defiance

Valerie Braithwaite, Monika Reinhart

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Deterrence can boost compliance with tax authorities or undermine it depending on whether taxpayers cope with the threat of taxation through thinking morally, or feeling oppressed, or taking control of the tax they pay. When feeling oppressed dominates thinking morally in response to deterrence, resistant defiance is expressed. When taking control and feeling oppressed dominate thinking morally, dismissive defiance is expressed. Longitudinal data show that perceived deterrence predicts lower tax evasion. Over and above this prediction is the finding that dismissive defiance (which can increase or decrease with deterrence) predicts higher tax evasion. Deterrence needs to be used judiciously. If deterrence promotes dismissive defiance through being seen as too weak or too oppressive, deterrence may prove counterproductive.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)439-468
    Number of pages30
    JournalFinanzArchiv
    Volume69
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Deterrence, coping styles and defiance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this