Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: The case for measuring impact

Sophie Staniszewska*, Ade Adebajo, Rosemary Barber, Peter Beresford, Louca Mai Brady, Jo Brett, Jim Elliott, David Evans, Kirstie L. Haywood, David Jones, Carole Mockford, Mary Nettle, Diana Rose, Tracey Williamson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While patient and public involvement (PPI) in health and social care research has progressed successfully in the last decade, a range of difficulties with the evidence base exist, including poor understanding of the concept of impact, limited theorization and an absence of quantitative impact measurement. In this paper, we argue that a paradigm change towards robust measurement of the impact of involvement in research is needed to complement qualitative explorations. We argue that service users should be collaboratively involved in the conceptualization, theorization and development of instruments to measure PPI impact. We consider the key advantages measurement would bring in strengthening the PPI evidence base through a greater understanding of what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)628-632
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Consumer Studies
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: The case for measuring impact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this