Abstract
This article presents and juxtaposes critical genealogies of develpment studies and postcolonial studies, two bodies of liberature on the 'Third World' that ignore each other's missions and writings. I demonstrate that the two fields have some areas of convergence, such as groundings in knowledge of and concern about the West, and other areas of divergence: development studies does not tend to listen to subalterns and postcolonial studies does not tend to concern itself with whether the subaltern is eating. I argue that, of the two fields, postcolonial studies has the greatest potential to be a new and different location of human development thinking if it can overcome a tendency to lock into intellectual rather than practical projects of postcolonialism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 703-721 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Third World Quarterly |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 1999 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Development studies and postcolonial studies: Disparate tales of the 'Third World''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver