Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Developmental control of promoter activity is not responsible for mature onset of Cf-9B-mediated resistance to leaf mold in tomato

  • S. N. Panter
  • , K. E. Hammond-Kosack
  • , K. Harrison
  • , J. D.G. Jones
  • , David A. Jones*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    56 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Cf-9 confers resistance to tomato seedlings and mature plants against Cladosporium fulvum races expressing the Avr9 elicitor. It is the central member of a cluster of five paralogous genes in an introgressed segment of chromosome 1 derived from Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. The other four genes have been named Hcr9-9A, Hcr9-9B, Hcr9-9D, and Hcr9-9E. Hcr9-9B, here designated Cf-9B, encodes weaker resistance than Cf-9, recognizes a different elicitor, and protects only mature plants from infection. The onset of Cf-9B-mediated resistance and the molecular basis for its developmental control were investigated in this study. Fungal inoculation of tomato plants containing reciprocal Cf-9/Cf-9B promoter-coding region swaps, analysis of tomato plants containing promotergusA fusions, and a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction study of Cf-9 and Cf-9B transcripts in tomato plants suggested that transcriptional control of Cf-9B did not account for the late onset of Cf-9B-mediated resistance. Alternative explanations for the onset of Cf-9B-mediated resistance in mature plants are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1099-1107
    Number of pages9
    JournalMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
    Volume15
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Developmental control of promoter activity is not responsible for mature onset of Cf-9B-mediated resistance to leaf mold in tomato'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this