Did the great influenza of 1918-1920 trigger a reversal of the first era of globalization?

Pierre L. Siklos*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I revisit the 1918–20 pandemic and ask whether it led to a reversal in the rise of trade and financial globalization that preceded it. Using annual data for 17 countries for the 1870–1928 period, a variety of tests and techniques are used to draw some robust conclusions. Overall, the pandemic a century ago interrupted, but did not put an end, to the first globalization of the twentieth century. However, two blocs consisting of combatant and non-combatant countries, experienced significantly different consequences. Globalization was sharply curtailed for the combatant countries while there were few, if any, consequences for globalization in the non-combatant group of countries. That said, there was considerable resilience especially in trade openness among several of the combatant economies. Perhaps changes in the make-up of economic blocs, post-pandemic, is a fallout from shocks of this kind. While there are lessons for the ongoing COVID pandemics differences between the 1920s and today also play a role.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-490
Number of pages32
JournalInternational Economics and Economic Policy
Volume19
Issue number3
Early online date22 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Did the great influenza of 1918-1920 trigger a reversal of the first era of globalization?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this