Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: The role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits

Prashant Bordia*, Bernd Irmer, David Abusah

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

133 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is an essential component of effective knowledge management. However, evaluation apprehension, or the fear that your work may be critiqued, can inhibit knowledge sharing. Using the general framework of social exchange theory, we examined the effects of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefit of knowledge sharing (such as enhanced reputation) on employees' knowledge sharing intentions in two contexts: interpersonal (i.e., by direct contact between two employees) and database (i.e., via repositories). Evaluation apprehension was negatively associated with knowledge sharing intentions in both contexts while perceived benefit was only positively associated with knowledge sharing intentions in the database context. Moreover, compared to the interpersonal context, evaluation apprehension was higher and knowledge sharing lower in the database context. Finally, the negative effects of evaluation apprehension upon knowledge sharing intentions were worse when perceived benefits were low compared to when perceived benefits were high.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)262-280
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: The role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this