Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: A challenge for guideline development

Sietse Wieringa; Dunja Dreesens; Frode Forland; Carel Hulshof; Sue Lukersmith; Fergus Macbeth; Beth Shaw; Arlène Van Vliet; Teun Zuiderent-Jerak

doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844

Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: A challenge for guideline development

Sietse Wieringa^*
, Dunja Dreesens
, Frode Forland
, Carel Hulshof
, Sue Lukersmith
, Fergus Macbeth
, Beth Shaw
, Arlène Van Vliet
, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development, monitoring, and reporting of indicator measures that describe standard of care provide the gold standard for assessing quality of care and patient outcomes. Although indicator measures have been reported, little evidence of their use in measuring and benchmarking performance is available. A standard set, defining numerator, denominator, and risk adjustments, will enable global benchmarking of quality of care.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	87-91
Number of pages	5
Journal	BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume	23
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2018

Access to Document

10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844

Cite this

@article{350abbfd5ca14484bb320d6832dc4a9c,

title = "Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: A challenge for guideline development",

abstract = "The development, monitoring, and reporting of indicator measures that describe standard of care provide the gold standard for assessing quality of care and patient outcomes. Although indicator measures have been reported, little evidence of their use in measuring and benchmarking performance is available. A standard set, defining numerator, denominator, and risk adjustments, will enable global benchmarking of quality of care.",

author = "Sietse Wieringa and Dunja Dreesens and Frode Forland and Carel Hulshof and Sue Lukersmith and Fergus Macbeth and Beth Shaw and \{Van Vliet\}, Arl{\`e}ne and Teun Zuiderent-Jerak",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "87--91",

journal = "BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine",

issn = "2515-446X",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning

T2 - A challenge for guideline development

AU - Wieringa, Sietse

AU - Dreesens, Dunja

AU - Forland, Frode

AU - Hulshof, Carel

AU - Lukersmith, Sue

AU - Macbeth, Fergus

AU - Shaw, Beth

AU - Van Vliet, Arlène

AU - Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - The development, monitoring, and reporting of indicator measures that describe standard of care provide the gold standard for assessing quality of care and patient outcomes. Although indicator measures have been reported, little evidence of their use in measuring and benchmarking performance is available. A standard set, defining numerator, denominator, and risk adjustments, will enable global benchmarking of quality of care.

AB - The development, monitoring, and reporting of indicator measures that describe standard of care provide the gold standard for assessing quality of care and patient outcomes. Although indicator measures have been reported, little evidence of their use in measuring and benchmarking performance is available. A standard set, defining numerator, denominator, and risk adjustments, will enable global benchmarking of quality of care.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85052650696

U2 - 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844

DO - 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844

M3 - Review article

SN - 2515-446X

VL - 23

SP - 87

EP - 91

JO - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

IS - 3

ER -

Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: A challenge for guideline development

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this