Differentiating bamboo from stone tool cut marks in the zooarchaeological record, with a discussion on the use of bamboo knives

Jolee A. West, Julien Louys*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The archaeological record of Southeast Asia is marked by a relative lack of Acheulian assemblages compared with the rest of the Old World. Suggestions that prehistoric human populations in this area relied instead on a non-lithic technology based on bamboo have not been supported by archaeological evidence. To provide a diagnostic means of assessing prehistoric use of bamboo, cut marks were experimentally produced on bone using chert tools and bamboo knives. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination revealed morphological differences in cut marks produced by the two materials that allow identification of bamboo knife cut marks on faunal materials. Such evidence, if found in Pleistocene through early Holocene archaeological sites in Southeast Asia, would indicate early human reliance on bamboo technology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)512-518
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differentiating bamboo from stone tool cut marks in the zooarchaeological record, with a discussion on the use of bamboo knives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this