Abstract
We build a directed technical change model where one intermediate goods sector uses a fixed quantity of biomass energy (“wood”) and another uses coal at a fixed price, matching stylized facts for the British Industrial Revolution. Unlike previous research, we do not assume the level or growth rate of productivity is inherently higher in the coal-using sector. Analytically, greater initial wood scarcity, initial relative knowledge of coal-using technologies, and/or population growth will boost an industrial rev-olution, while the converse may prevent one forever. An industrial revolution, with eventual dominance by the coal-using sector, is the model’s main dynamic outcome, but not inevitable if inter-good substitutability is high enough. Empirical calibration for 1560–1900 produces historically plausible results for changes in energy-related variables during British industrialization, and through counterfactual simulations confirms that it was the growing relative scarcity of wood caused by population growth that resulted in innovation to develop coal-using machines.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1079-1114 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2021 |