Discordance of international adiposity classifications in Australian boys and girls - The LOOK study

Richard D. Telford, Ross B. Cunningham, Robin M. Daly, Graham J. Reynolds, Antony R.A. Lafferty, Karen J. Gravenmaker, Marc M. Budge, Ahmad Javaid, Shona L. Bass, Rohan M. Telford

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Various charts based on body mass index (BMI) and per cent body fat (%BF) are used to classify childhood body composition but outcomes may vary. Aim: The study investigated variation in incidences of childhood obesity as depicted by four classification charts. Subjects and methods: BMI and DXA-derived %BF were assessed in 741 children. Incidences of overweight and obesity were compared between two BMI charts and two bioelectrical impedance (BIA)-based %BF charts. Results: The International Obesity Task Force (IOTF)-adopted BMI chart designated 21%, 6% (boys), and 26%, 9% (girls) as overweight and obese, respectively. Corresponding figures using the USA CDC BMI chart were 27%, 11% (boys) and 27%, 12% (girls). Using a USA-derived %BF chart incidences were 17%, 2% (boys) and 21%, 8% (girls) and using a UK-derived %BF chart 51%, 24% (boys) and 53%, 36% (girls). Sensitivity of BMI varied according to the %BF reference chart. Conclusions: In contrast to the BMI-based charts, there were considerable variations in depicted incidences of obesity between the %BF-based charts. These discordances were considered to result from previously reported variation within and between BIA and DXA %BF assessments underlying the charts. The present study highlights the need for valid, reliable, unchanging BIA and DXA procedures.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)334-341
    Number of pages8
    JournalAnnals of Human Biology
    Volume35
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Discordance of international adiposity classifications in Australian boys and girls - The LOOK study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this