Discourses of democracy in neighborhood governance

Michael Farrelly*, Helen Sullivan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is concerned with neighborhood governance reflecting a policy agenda which identifies the 'neighborhood' as a significant space for democratic renewal. But how is democracy understood and practiced? Many neighborhood policy programs are sponsored by central or local government and public managers have an important role in translating policy into local practice. Using a critical discourse analytic framework we examine actual examples of public managers' descriptions of their governance arrangements to elaborate their understandings and interpretations of democracy. Examples are taken from interviews in neighborhood renewal schemes in Birmingham and Copenhagen. Analysis suggests that in the cases examined here the democratic devices associated with different ideal-types of neighborhood governance presented both actual and potential dilemmas for public managers or became lost amongst other more immediate concerns for each project. This suggests that the democratic element of neighborhood governance may need even more clear conceptual work and more forceful advocacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-249
Number of pages16
JournalCritical Policy Studies
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discourses of democracy in neighborhood governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this