Abstract
The type specimen of partzite has been reinvestigated by powder X-ray diffraction and electron microprobe traverses. Re-examination of the type material shows that it is a mixture of several phases, intergrown on a submicrometre scale and hence not fully resolved by electron microprobe. Investigation of major-element spot analyses for correlations between elements indicates that the two dominant phases are a plumboroméite-like oxide phase and a chrysocolla-like amorphous Cu silicate. This analysis also suggested the presence of several minor phases that were too scarce to be detectable by X-ray diffraction, including acanthite, chlorargyrite, baryte, halite, and an Al-rich clay mineral. Lack of correlation between Si-corrected Cu content and Sb content implies that Cu is not a significant component of the roméite-group mineral. Partzite is therefore discredited as a valid mineral species. This proposal has been approved by the IMA CNMNC (proposal 16-B).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1019-1024 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | European Journal of Mineralogy |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Discreditation of partzite'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver