TY - JOUR
T1 - Discussing death
T2 - Making end of life implicit or explicit in paediatric palliative care consultations
AU - Ekberg, Stuart
AU - Danby, Susan
AU - Rendle-Short, Johanna
AU - Herbert, Anthony
AU - Bradford, Natalie K.
AU - Yates, Patsy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Objective: To consider whether and how family members and clinicians discuss end of life during paediatric palliative care consultations. Methods: Nine naturally occurring paediatric palliative care consultations were video recorded and analysed using conversation analytic methods. Analysis: Focusing on three consultations in which end of life was treated as a certain outcome, analysis explored ways in which end of life was made either implicit or explicit within these consultations. Our analysis suggests that end of life was made explicit when: 1) ancillary to the current focus of discussion, 2) in relation to someone else's child, or 3) specifically relevant to the local context of the discussion. More commonly, in all other instances in the data, end of life was made implicit during discussions relating to this matter. Conclusion: This preliminary research indicates that the local context of a conversation can influence how end of life is mentioned and discussed. Practice implications: Clinicians often are encouraged to promote honest and ‘open’ discussions about end of life. Our findings show that it is not necessary to explicitly mention end of life in order to discuss it.
AB - Objective: To consider whether and how family members and clinicians discuss end of life during paediatric palliative care consultations. Methods: Nine naturally occurring paediatric palliative care consultations were video recorded and analysed using conversation analytic methods. Analysis: Focusing on three consultations in which end of life was treated as a certain outcome, analysis explored ways in which end of life was made either implicit or explicit within these consultations. Our analysis suggests that end of life was made explicit when: 1) ancillary to the current focus of discussion, 2) in relation to someone else's child, or 3) specifically relevant to the local context of the discussion. More commonly, in all other instances in the data, end of life was made implicit during discussions relating to this matter. Conclusion: This preliminary research indicates that the local context of a conversation can influence how end of life is mentioned and discussed. Practice implications: Clinicians often are encouraged to promote honest and ‘open’ discussions about end of life. Our findings show that it is not necessary to explicitly mention end of life in order to discuss it.
KW - Communication
KW - Conversation analysis
KW - Death
KW - Dying
KW - Professional-patient relations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053340730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.014
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.014
M3 - Article
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 102
SP - 198
EP - 206
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 2
ER -