Discussing death: Making end of life implicit or explicit in paediatric palliative care consultations

Stuart Ekberg*, Susan Danby, Johanna Rendle-Short, Anthony Herbert, Natalie K. Bradford, Patsy Yates

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To consider whether and how family members and clinicians discuss end of life during paediatric palliative care consultations. Methods: Nine naturally occurring paediatric palliative care consultations were video recorded and analysed using conversation analytic methods. Analysis: Focusing on three consultations in which end of life was treated as a certain outcome, analysis explored ways in which end of life was made either implicit or explicit within these consultations. Our analysis suggests that end of life was made explicit when: 1) ancillary to the current focus of discussion, 2) in relation to someone else's child, or 3) specifically relevant to the local context of the discussion. More commonly, in all other instances in the data, end of life was made implicit during discussions relating to this matter. Conclusion: This preliminary research indicates that the local context of a conversation can influence how end of life is mentioned and discussed. Practice implications: Clinicians often are encouraged to promote honest and ‘open’ discussions about end of life. Our findings show that it is not necessary to explicitly mention end of life in order to discuss it.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)198-206
    Number of pages9
    JournalPatient Education and Counseling
    Volume102
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Discussing death: Making end of life implicit or explicit in paediatric palliative care consultations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this