TY - JOUR
T1 - Disgorging the fruits of historical wrongdoing
AU - Goodin, Robert E.
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - There are many different ways of responding to wrongdoing: person-centered or object-centered, victim-centered or perpetrator-centered, and fault-oriented or not. Among these approaches, requiring innocent beneficiaries to disgorge the fruits of historical wrongdoings of others is attractive because it is informationally the least demanding. Although that approach is perhaps not ideal, at least it is feasible where other responses are not, and doing something is better than doing nothing in response to grievous historical wrongdoing. Depending on circumstances, disgorgement can be in whole or in part, in kind or in cash. Even without the full information that disgorgement itself requires, general redistributive taxation might be justified as a tolerably close approximation.
AB - There are many different ways of responding to wrongdoing: person-centered or object-centered, victim-centered or perpetrator-centered, and fault-oriented or not. Among these approaches, requiring innocent beneficiaries to disgorge the fruits of historical wrongdoings of others is attractive because it is informationally the least demanding. Although that approach is perhaps not ideal, at least it is feasible where other responses are not, and doing something is better than doing nothing in response to grievous historical wrongdoing. Depending on circumstances, disgorgement can be in whole or in part, in kind or in cash. Even without the full information that disgorgement itself requires, general redistributive taxation might be justified as a tolerably close approximation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881413723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0003055413000233
DO - 10.1017/S0003055413000233
M3 - Article
SN - 0003-0554
VL - 107
SP - 478
EP - 491
JO - American Political Science Review
JF - American Political Science Review
IS - 3
ER -