Abstract
There are many different ways of responding to wrongdoing: person-centered or object-centered, victim-centered or perpetrator-centered, and fault-oriented or not. Among these approaches, requiring innocent beneficiaries to disgorge the fruits of historical wrongdoings of others is attractive because it is informationally the least demanding. Although that approach is perhaps not ideal, at least it is feasible where other responses are not, and doing something is better than doing nothing in response to grievous historical wrongdoing. Depending on circumstances, disgorgement can be in whole or in part, in kind or in cash. Even without the full information that disgorgement itself requires, general redistributive taxation might be justified as a tolerably close approximation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 478-491 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | American Political Science Review |
| Volume | 107 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2013 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Disgorging the fruits of historical wrongdoing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver