Divergent views on trophy hunting in Africa, and what this may mean for research and policy

Shaya van Houdt, Richard P. Brown, Thomas C. Wanger, Wayne Twine, Richard Fynn, Kenneth Uiseb, Rosie Cooney, Lochran W. Traill*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Over the past decade, trophy hunting in Africa has seen increased public and scientific interest. Much of that attention has come from outside of Africa, with little emphasis on local views. We circulated an online survey through international networks to explore demographic and regional differences in opinion regards support for African trophy hunting, trophy import bans, and outside funding of conservation estates supported by hunting. We received ∼5700 responses and found that location, demography, and conservation background influenced opinion. African and North American respondents showed (significantly) more support for trophy hunting than respondents from Europe or other areas, as did respondents with conservation backgrounds. Unlike North Americans, Africans supported external subsidies of wildlife areas presently funded by hunting. Many factors affected opinions on African hunting, but respondent location played a major role. Realistic policy on African trophy hunting should thus integrate African perspectives, in particular those of rural communities.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere12840
    JournalConservation Letters
    Volume14
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Divergent views on trophy hunting in Africa, and what this may mean for research and policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this