TY - JOUR
T1 - Diversity, tolerance, and the social contract
AU - Bruner, Justin P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, © The Author(s) 2014.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Philosophers and social scientists have recently turned to game theory and agent-based models to better understand social contract formation. The stag hunt game is an idealization of social contract formation. Using the stag hunt game, we attempt to determine what, if any, barrier diversity is to the formation of an efficient social contract. We uncover a deep connection between tolerance, diversity, and the social contract. We investigate a simple model in which individuals possess salient traits and behave cooperatively when the difference between their trait and the trait of their counterpart is less than their ‘tolerance level’. If traits are fixed and correspond to permanent or semipermanent features of the individual, such as religion or race, social contract formation is a remote possibility. If traits are malleable, social contract formation is possible but comes at the steep cost of diversity and tolerance, that is, individuals are unwilling to cooperate with those much different from themselves. Yet homogeneity and intolerance are not a long-term feature of the population. Over time mutations allow for increasingly tolerant agents to prosper, thereby ushering in trait diversity. In the end, all reap the benefits of cooperation.
AB - Philosophers and social scientists have recently turned to game theory and agent-based models to better understand social contract formation. The stag hunt game is an idealization of social contract formation. Using the stag hunt game, we attempt to determine what, if any, barrier diversity is to the formation of an efficient social contract. We uncover a deep connection between tolerance, diversity, and the social contract. We investigate a simple model in which individuals possess salient traits and behave cooperatively when the difference between their trait and the trait of their counterpart is less than their ‘tolerance level’. If traits are fixed and correspond to permanent or semipermanent features of the individual, such as religion or race, social contract formation is a remote possibility. If traits are malleable, social contract formation is possible but comes at the steep cost of diversity and tolerance, that is, individuals are unwilling to cooperate with those much different from themselves. Yet homogeneity and intolerance are not a long-term feature of the population. Over time mutations allow for increasingly tolerant agents to prosper, thereby ushering in trait diversity. In the end, all reap the benefits of cooperation.
KW - cultural evolution
KW - diversity
KW - expanding circle
KW - game theory
KW - social contract theory
KW - the stag hunt
KW - tolerance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945121665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1470594X14560763
DO - 10.1177/1470594X14560763
M3 - Article
SN - 1470-594X
VL - 14
SP - 429
EP - 448
JO - Politics, Philosophy and Economics
JF - Politics, Philosophy and Economics
IS - 4
ER -