Abstract
The effectiveness of any sanction depends on the costs of avoiding its restrictions. We examine whether bearish option strategies were substitutes for short sales during the September 2008 short-sale ban. We find a significant diminution in option volumes and a significant increase in option bid-ask spreads for banned stock relative to unbanned stock during the ban period. Apparent violations of the put-call parity bound became significantly more frequent for banned stocks during the ban period. We conclude that the ban acted as an effective restriction on trading in options.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 331-348 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Financial Economics |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |