Do Outside Directors with Government Experience Create Value?

Jun Koo Kang, Le Zhang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We examine whether outside directors with government experience add value to their firms. We find that government directors are more likely to miss board meetings and that their appointment announcements are greeted more negatively. Firms with government directors also experience poorer operating performance and more negative merger announcement returns, although their mergers are less likely to be challenged by antitrust authorities. These adverse valuation effects are largely alleviated when firms have large government sales, when they operate in regulated industries, or when government directors are politically connected. Using close gubernatorial election outcomes as a natural experiment and an instrumental variables approach to control for endogeneity bias do not change the results.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)209-251
    Number of pages43
    JournalFinancial Management
    Volume47
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do Outside Directors with Government Experience Create Value?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this