Do We Impose Undue Risk When We Emit and Offset? A Reply to Stefansson

Christian Barry, Garrett Cullity*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We have previously argued that there are forms of greenhouse gas offsetting for which, when one emits and offsets, one imposes no risk. Orri Stefansson objects that our argument fails to distinguish properly between the people who stand to be harmed by one’s emissions and the people who stand to be benefited by one’s offsetting. We reply by emphasizing the difference between acting with a probability of making a difference to the distribution of harm and acting in a way that worsen’s someone’s prospect.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)242-248
    Number of pages7
    JournalEthics, Policy and Environment
    Volume25
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do We Impose Undue Risk When We Emit and Offset? A Reply to Stefansson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this