Do we want our data raw? Including binary mass spectrometry data in public proteomics data repositories

Lennart Martens*, Alexey I. Nesvizhskii, Henning Hermjakob, Marcin Adamski, Gilbert S. Omenn, Joël Vandekerckhove, Kris Gevaert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the human Plasma Proteome Project (PPP) pilot phase completed, the largest and most ambitious proteomics experiment to date has reached its first milestone. The correspondingly impressive amount of data that came from this pilot project emphasized the need for a centralized dissemination mechanism and led to the development of a detailed, PPP specific data gathering infrastructure at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor as well as the protein identifications database project at the European Bioinformatics Institute as a general proteomics data repository. One issue that crept up while discussing which data to store for the PPP concerns whether the raw, binary data coming from the mass spectrometers should be stored, or rather the more compact and already significantly processed peak lists. As this debate is not restricted to the PPP but relates to the proteomics community in general, we will attempt to detail the relative merits and caveats associated with centralized storage and dissemination of raw data and/or peak lists, building on the extensive experience gained during the PPP pilot phase. Finally, some suggestions are made for both immediate and future storage of MS data in public repositories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3501-3505
Number of pages5
JournalProteomics
Volume5
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do we want our data raw? Including binary mass spectrometry data in public proteomics data repositories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this