Doctors' experience of stress during simulated bad news consultations

Joanne Shaw*, Rhonda Brown, Paul Heinrich, Stewart Dunn

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: Breaking bad news (BBN) is a core component of medicine. Psychophysiological studies confirm the subjective reports of doctors that BBN is a stressful experience. This study investigated doctors' physiological stress responses prior to and during two simulated bad news consultations. Methods: Thirty-one doctors participated in a speech-interaction task and two simulated BBN consultations. Heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC) were recorded using consecutive 30-s epochs during each of the interactions. The simulations were video recorded. Results: Most doctors showed an early anticipatory increase in HR and SC that peaked during the reading of the case history prior to the BBN consultations. Most doctors then experienced a brief and relatively small stress response. However, about one-third of the doctors showed a significant and sustained stress response. Conclusions: The results suggest that most doctors were cognitively engaged with the BBN tasks, however, a small proportion of doctors might have focused more on their own internal feelings and less on these contextual features. Practice implications: In regards to training medical students and doctors, these results suggest that there is a need to focus more on the impact of these encounters on the doctors, not just their performance during these encounters.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)203-208
    Number of pages6
    JournalPatient Education and Counseling
    Volume93
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Doctors' experience of stress during simulated bad news consultations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this