Abstract
This study examines whether exploration and evaluation (E&E) expenditures are associated with bias in analysts forecasts. We find that analyst forecast pessimism increases with the intensity of E&E activities. We also find that analysts private information development acquisitions mediate the effect of exploration intensity on analyst forecast bias, but the extent of competition among analysts is not a mediating factor. The results suggest that analysts issue biased forecasts to gain access to management of firms with substantial E&E activities. Additional analyses reveal that firms capability of generating revenues from production activities is a viable mechanism for constraining analysts strategically biasing behavior. Effective enforcement is needed to prevent the inequity of information access among market participants, particularly in the extractive industries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Event | EAA2017 40th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association - Valencia, Spain Duration: 1 Jan 2018 → … |
Conference
Conference | EAA2017 40th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association |
---|---|
Period | 1/01/18 → … |
Other | 10-12 May 2017 |