Dramatic Rationalities: Electoral Theater in the Age of Trump

Mark Chou, Michael Ondaatje

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In April 2015, just as the campaign for the 2016 U.S. presidential election was kicking off, The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson (2015) opined that much of what counts for election coverage today has become “indistinguishable from theater criticism: Its chief concerns are storyline, costumes, and the quality of public performances.” According to Thompson, political journalists who cover election campaigns as theater critics not only conflate style with substance, they also popularize the notion that “the best actors will make the best candidates (and, by extension, the best presidents).” Citizens who depend on the media for reliable campaign coverage and substantive analyses of candidates’ policies will either be left unsatisfied or none the wiser. In the worst-case scenario, the public will begin to believe that style, performance, and drama are what ultimately matter when it comes to understanding electoral politics. That is bad both for individual citizens and for democracy as a whole.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWhy Irrational Politics Appeals: Understanding the Allure of Trump
EditorsMari Fitzduff
Place of PublicationCalifornia
PublisherPraeger Publishers
Pages191-204
Volume1
Edition1
ISBN (Print)978-1-4408-5514-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dramatic Rationalities: Electoral Theater in the Age of Trump'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this