Drawing blanks: The pale shades of ‘phaedrus’ and ‘juvenal’

Tom Geue*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter examines two exponents of satiric literature written under the politically fraught conditions of the Roman Principate, Phaedrus and Juvenal. It is unclear who (or what) both were; their names, shorthands for de-authored texts rather than stand-ins for historical individuals. The literal self-effacement at work here creates a paradoxical authority: the words on the page, loosened from a definite first-person speaker identity, slip and slide easily from person to person, yet the concealment wreaks havoc with the readerly desire to know the source behind the words, generating an energetic ‘erotics’ of the weaker voice. This chapter analyses their shared yet distinctive strategies of authorial self-erasure, arguing that both not only render key markers of Roman elite male identity-name, body, and autobiography—ineffective, but that, in doing so, they also foreground and relish the particular potential of literature as the written word in its supposed inferiority to author-bound speech.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComplex Inferiorities
Subtitle of host publicationThe Poetics of the Weaker Voice in Latin Literature
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages89-106
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9780198814061
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drawing blanks: The pale shades of ‘phaedrus’ and ‘juvenal’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this