Abstract
We analyzed the market for indivisible, pure status goods. Firms produce and sell different brands of pure status goods to a population that is willing to signal individual abilities to potential matches in another population. Individual status is determined by the most expensive status good one has. There is a stratified equilibrium with a finite number of brands. Under constant tax rates, a monopoly sells different brands to social classes of equal measure, while in contestable markets, social classes have decreasing measures. Under optimal taxation, contestable markets have progressive tax rates, while a monopoly faces an adequate flat tax rate to all brands. In contrast with extant literature, subsidies may be socially optimal, depending on the parameters, in both market structures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 103-131 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Games and Economic Behavior |
| Volume | 82 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2013 |