Driving public sector environmental reporting: The disclosure practices of Australian Commonwealth Departments

Sumit Lodhia*, Kerry Jacobs, Yoon Jin Park

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    110 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article analyses environmental reporting practices within public sector entities. It explores the type and extent of environmental disclosures by all 19 Australian Commonwealth Departments in annual reports and sustainability reports, through a legitimacy approach and a content analysis instrument based on the global reporting initiative (GRI). The findings of this research indicate that there is relatively little difference in the reporting practices of departments with legitimacy drivers of size and mission than other departments. We see little evidence of a wide-spread adoption of GRI reporting and argue that drivers internal to government, particularly the coercive influence of legislation and government-regulation, are a better explanation of public sector environment reporting than a legitimacy explanation. We argue that there is some support for a legitimacy argument in that the most significant category of environmental reporting was reporting of departmental initiatives which could be seen as having potential legitimacy motivation and benefits. We conclude with the argument that a more sophisticated approach to legitimacy is required to understand the role of environmental reporting in the public sector context.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)631-647
    Number of pages17
    JournalPublic Management Review
    Volume14
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Driving public sector environmental reporting: The disclosure practices of Australian Commonwealth Departments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this