TY - JOUR
T1 - Driving public sector environmental reporting
T2 - The disclosure practices of Australian Commonwealth Departments
AU - Lodhia, Sumit
AU - Jacobs, Kerry
AU - Park, Yoon Jin
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This article analyses environmental reporting practices within public sector entities. It explores the type and extent of environmental disclosures by all 19 Australian Commonwealth Departments in annual reports and sustainability reports, through a legitimacy approach and a content analysis instrument based on the global reporting initiative (GRI). The findings of this research indicate that there is relatively little difference in the reporting practices of departments with legitimacy drivers of size and mission than other departments. We see little evidence of a wide-spread adoption of GRI reporting and argue that drivers internal to government, particularly the coercive influence of legislation and government-regulation, are a better explanation of public sector environment reporting than a legitimacy explanation. We argue that there is some support for a legitimacy argument in that the most significant category of environmental reporting was reporting of departmental initiatives which could be seen as having potential legitimacy motivation and benefits. We conclude with the argument that a more sophisticated approach to legitimacy is required to understand the role of environmental reporting in the public sector context.
AB - This article analyses environmental reporting practices within public sector entities. It explores the type and extent of environmental disclosures by all 19 Australian Commonwealth Departments in annual reports and sustainability reports, through a legitimacy approach and a content analysis instrument based on the global reporting initiative (GRI). The findings of this research indicate that there is relatively little difference in the reporting practices of departments with legitimacy drivers of size and mission than other departments. We see little evidence of a wide-spread adoption of GRI reporting and argue that drivers internal to government, particularly the coercive influence of legislation and government-regulation, are a better explanation of public sector environment reporting than a legitimacy explanation. We argue that there is some support for a legitimacy argument in that the most significant category of environmental reporting was reporting of departmental initiatives which could be seen as having potential legitimacy motivation and benefits. We conclude with the argument that a more sophisticated approach to legitimacy is required to understand the role of environmental reporting in the public sector context.
KW - Australian commonwealth government
KW - Environmental reporting
KW - Global reporting initiative
KW - Legitimacy
KW - Public sector
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868284587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14719037.2011.642565
DO - 10.1080/14719037.2011.642565
M3 - Article
SN - 1471-9037
VL - 14
SP - 631
EP - 647
JO - Public Management Review
JF - Public Management Review
IS - 5
ER -