Eating and drinking in Mandarin and Shanghainese: A Lexical-Conceptual analysis

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    There are many activities that humans cannot do without. Eating and drinking are two of them. But, do people conceptualise these ‘basic’ human activities in the same way? This paper provides a Chinese perspective from two varieties of Sinitic languages—Mandarin Chinese and Shanghai Wu, which is spoken in the Shanghai metropolitan area by approximately 14 million native speakers. Both of these forms of Chinese suggest two different ways of conceptualisation. In Mandarin Chinese, a lexical distinction is made between chī and hē, comparable to eat and drink in English (but not exactly the same); whereas in Shanghai Wu one single lexical item čhyq is used to describe any activity involving ingestion. The paper conducts a detailed contrastive semantic analysis of these concepts in question, explores the motivations behind their figurative meaning extensions, and uses the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) to articulate the conceptulisations reflected in these concepts. The findings of this paper are consistent with those emerging from crosslinguistic investigation of less familiar languages in recent times, in that there are variations in linguistic coding of eating and drinking (e.g. Newman, 2009b). However, this paper also illustrates that one perhaps should not underestimate the variations of conceptualisation within one ethnic group.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationQuantitative approaches to problems in linguistics: Studies in honour of Phil Rose
    EditorsCathryn Donohue, Shunichi Ishihara and William Steed
    Place of PublicationMunich, Germany
    PublisherLincom Europa
    Pages265-280
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9783862883844
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Eating and drinking in Mandarin and Shanghainese: A Lexical-Conceptual analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this