Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources

Heather Keith*, Michael Vardon, John A. Stein, Janet L. Stein, David Lindenmayer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    107 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Decisions about natural resource management are frequently complex and vexed, often leading to public policy compromises. Discord between environmental and economic metrics creates problems in assessing trade-offs between different current or potential resource uses. Ecosystem accounts, which quantify ecosystems and their benefits for human well-being consistent with national economic accounts, provide exciting opportunities to contribute significantly to the policy process. We advanced the application of ecosystem accounts in a regional case study by explicitly and spatially linking impacts of human and natural activities on ecosystem assets and services to their associated industries. This demonstrated contributions of ecosystems beyond the traditional national accounts. Our results revealed that native forests would provide greater benefits from their ecosystem services of carbon sequestration, water yield, habitat provisioning and recreational amenity if harvesting for timber production ceased, thus allowing forests to continue growing to older ages.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1683-1692
    Number of pages10
    JournalNature Ecology and Evolution
    Volume1
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this