TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective Combinations of Control Strategies in Inter-Organizational Projects
AU - Ning, Yan
AU - Zwikael, Ofer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1988-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Effective control is crucial to enhance project performance. Accordingly, organizations implement various control strategies to manage projects, e.g., formal, social, bureaucratic, and clan control. Control is a particular challenge in interorganizational projects (IOPs) due to the coexistence of intra-and interorganizational control strategies. Whereas previous literature discussed control strategies of each organization (e.g., owner and delivery organizations) separately, this article argues that managers of IOPs should align intra-and interorganizational control strategies. To identify effective control strategies in IOPs, this article analyzes how six control strategies combinations (implemented by the project owner and delivery organizations) influence IOP performance. Based on survey data from 360 Architectural and Engineering (A/E) design practitioners in China, results suggest that effective combinations of control strategies in IOPs are context-dependent: 1) when project owner organizations implement interorganizational formal control strategies, their delivery organizations should implement intraorganizational bureaucratic and clan control strategies; 2) when project owner organizations implement interorganizational social control strategies, their delivery organizations should implement intraorganizational clan control strategies. This article expands agency theory and the project governance literature by matching effective combinations of control strategies to enhance the governance of IOPs.
AB - Effective control is crucial to enhance project performance. Accordingly, organizations implement various control strategies to manage projects, e.g., formal, social, bureaucratic, and clan control. Control is a particular challenge in interorganizational projects (IOPs) due to the coexistence of intra-and interorganizational control strategies. Whereas previous literature discussed control strategies of each organization (e.g., owner and delivery organizations) separately, this article argues that managers of IOPs should align intra-and interorganizational control strategies. To identify effective control strategies in IOPs, this article analyzes how six control strategies combinations (implemented by the project owner and delivery organizations) influence IOP performance. Based on survey data from 360 Architectural and Engineering (A/E) design practitioners in China, results suggest that effective combinations of control strategies in IOPs are context-dependent: 1) when project owner organizations implement interorganizational formal control strategies, their delivery organizations should implement intraorganizational bureaucratic and clan control strategies; 2) when project owner organizations implement interorganizational social control strategies, their delivery organizations should implement intraorganizational clan control strategies. This article expands agency theory and the project governance literature by matching effective combinations of control strategies to enhance the governance of IOPs.
KW - Architectural and engineering (A/E) design project
KW - control strategies
KW - fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)
KW - governance
KW - interorganizational projects (IOPs)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139415879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TEM.2022.3200990
DO - 10.1109/TEM.2022.3200990
M3 - Article
SN - 0018-9391
VL - 71
SP - 3062
EP - 3075
JO - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
JF - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
ER -