TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective combinations of control strategies in inter-organizational projects manuscript
AU - Ying, Nan
AU - Zwikael, Ofer
N1 - © 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Effective control is crucial to enhance project per formance. Accordingly, organizations implement various control strategies to manage projects, e.g., formal, social, bureaucratic, and clan control. Control is a particular challenge in interorga nizational projects (IOPs) due to the coexistence of intra- and interorganizational control strategies. Whereas previous literature discussed control strategies of each organization (e.g., owner and delivery organizations) separately, this article argues that man agers of IOPs should align intra- and interorganizational control strategies. To identify effective control strategies in IOPs, this article analyzes how six control strategies combinations (imple mented by the project owner and delivery organizations) influence IOP performance. Based on survey data from 360 Architectural and Engineering (A/E) design practitioners in China, results sug gest that effective combinations of control strategies in IOPs are context-dependent: 1) when project owner organizations imple ment interorganizational formal control strategies, their delivery organizations should implement intraorganizational bureaucratic and clan control strategies; 2) when project owner organizations implement interorganizational social control strategies, their de livery organizations should implement intraorganizational clan control strategies. This article expands agency theory and the project governance literature by matching effective combinations of control strategies to enhance the governance of IOPs. Index Terms—Architectural and engineering (A/E) design project, control strategies, fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), governance, interorganizational projects (IOPs).
AB - Effective control is crucial to enhance project per formance. Accordingly, organizations implement various control strategies to manage projects, e.g., formal, social, bureaucratic, and clan control. Control is a particular challenge in interorga nizational projects (IOPs) due to the coexistence of intra- and interorganizational control strategies. Whereas previous literature discussed control strategies of each organization (e.g., owner and delivery organizations) separately, this article argues that man agers of IOPs should align intra- and interorganizational control strategies. To identify effective control strategies in IOPs, this article analyzes how six control strategies combinations (imple mented by the project owner and delivery organizations) influence IOP performance. Based on survey data from 360 Architectural and Engineering (A/E) design practitioners in China, results sug gest that effective combinations of control strategies in IOPs are context-dependent: 1) when project owner organizations imple ment interorganizational formal control strategies, their delivery organizations should implement intraorganizational bureaucratic and clan control strategies; 2) when project owner organizations implement interorganizational social control strategies, their de livery organizations should implement intraorganizational clan control strategies. This article expands agency theory and the project governance literature by matching effective combinations of control strategies to enhance the governance of IOPs. Index Terms—Architectural and engineering (A/E) design project, control strategies, fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), governance, interorganizational projects (IOPs).
U2 - document/9896741
DO - document/9896741
M3 - Article
JO - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
JF - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
ER -