Effects of Closures and Openings on Public Health in the Time of COVID-19: A Cross-Country and Temporal Trend Analysis

Long Chu; R. Quentin Grafton; Tom Kompas; Mary Louise McLaws

doi:10.1177/21582440231207472

Effects of Closures and Openings on Public Health in the Time of COVID-19: A Cross-Country and Temporal Trend Analysis

Long Chu, R. Quentin Grafton^*, Tom Kompas, Mary Louise McLaws

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Many countries mandated social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 to 2022 that variously included opening hours restrictions on hospitality and retail, economy-wide closures, and additional international border controls. We analyzed whether more restrictive (hereafter, closures) or less restrictive (hereafter, openings) social distancing measures changed the short-term trends in the number of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and ICU patients in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Our analysis uses a “before-and-after” trend analysis (decremental/incremental and growth/decay trends) to compare the trends of epidemic indicators before and after each closure or opening event. Results show that, in general, and for these three countries: (a) closures resulted in reduced trend growth in adverse COVID-19 public health outcomes and (b) openings resulted in increased trend growth for the three selected measures of public health.

Original language	English
Journal	SAGE Open
Volume	13
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231207472
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2023

Access to Document

10.1177/21582440231207472

Cite this

@article{4abad1b84a98434eb06ac3dc185f3ee0,

title = "Effects of Closures and Openings on Public Health in the Time of COVID-19: A Cross-Country and Temporal Trend Analysis",

abstract = "Many countries mandated social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 to 2022 that variously included opening hours restrictions on hospitality and retail, economy-wide closures, and additional international border controls. We analyzed whether more restrictive (hereafter, closures) or less restrictive (hereafter, openings) social distancing measures changed the short-term trends in the number of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and ICU patients in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Our analysis uses a “before-and-after” trend analysis (decremental/incremental and growth/decay trends) to compare the trends of epidemic indicators before and after each closure or opening event. Results show that, in general, and for these three countries: (a) closures resulted in reduced trend growth in adverse COVID-19 public health outcomes and (b) openings resulted in increased trend growth for the three selected measures of public health.",

keywords = "Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, border closures, pandemic, social distancing, trend analysis",

author = "Long Chu and Grafton, {R. Quentin} and Tom Kompas and McLaws, {Mary Louise}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",

year = "2023",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/21582440231207472",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

journal = "SAGE Open",

issn = "2158-2440",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Closures and Openings on Public Health in the Time of COVID-19

T2 - A Cross-Country and Temporal Trend Analysis

AU - Chu, Long

AU - Grafton, R. Quentin

AU - Kompas, Tom

AU - McLaws, Mary Louise

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.

PY - 2023/10/1

Y1 - 2023/10/1

N2 - Many countries mandated social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 to 2022 that variously included opening hours restrictions on hospitality and retail, economy-wide closures, and additional international border controls. We analyzed whether more restrictive (hereafter, closures) or less restrictive (hereafter, openings) social distancing measures changed the short-term trends in the number of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and ICU patients in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Our analysis uses a “before-and-after” trend analysis (decremental/incremental and growth/decay trends) to compare the trends of epidemic indicators before and after each closure or opening event. Results show that, in general, and for these three countries: (a) closures resulted in reduced trend growth in adverse COVID-19 public health outcomes and (b) openings resulted in increased trend growth for the three selected measures of public health.

AB - Many countries mandated social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 to 2022 that variously included opening hours restrictions on hospitality and retail, economy-wide closures, and additional international border controls. We analyzed whether more restrictive (hereafter, closures) or less restrictive (hereafter, openings) social distancing measures changed the short-term trends in the number of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and ICU patients in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Our analysis uses a “before-and-after” trend analysis (decremental/incremental and growth/decay trends) to compare the trends of epidemic indicators before and after each closure or opening event. Results show that, in general, and for these three countries: (a) closures resulted in reduced trend growth in adverse COVID-19 public health outcomes and (b) openings resulted in increased trend growth for the three selected measures of public health.

KW - Australia

KW - Canada

KW - United Kingdom

KW - border closures

KW - pandemic

KW - social distancing

KW - trend analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177639805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/21582440231207472

DO - 10.1177/21582440231207472

M3 - Article

SN - 2158-2440

VL - 13

JO - SAGE Open

JF - SAGE Open

IS - 4

ER -

Effects of Closures and Openings on Public Health in the Time of COVID-19: A Cross-Country and Temporal Trend Analysis

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this