Abstract
Many political theorists defend the view that egalitarian justice should extend from the domestic to the global arena. Despite its intuitive appeal, this global egalitarianism has come under attack from different quarters. In this article, we focus on one particular set of challenges to this view: those advanced by domestic egalitarians. We consider seven types of challenges, each pointing to a specific disanalogy between domestic and global arenas which is said to justify the restriction of egalitarian justice to the former, and argue that none of them both individually and jointly offers a conclusive refutation of global egalitarianism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 485-512 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Review of International Studies |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2009 |