Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Elected member influence in the United Nations Security Council

Jeremy Farrall, Marie Eve Loiselle, Christopher Michaelsen, Jochen Prantl, Jeni Whalan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article reassesses how members of the UN Security Council exercise influence over the Council's decision-making process, with particular focus on the ten elected members (the E10). A common understanding of Security Council dynamics accords predominance to the five permanent members (the P5), suggesting bleak prospects for the Council as a forum that promotes the voices and representation of the 188 non-permanent members. The assumption is that real power rests with the P5, while the E10 are there to make up the numbers. By articulating a richer account of Council dynamics, this article contests the conventional wisdom that P5 centrality crowds out space for the E10 to influence Council decision-making. It also shows that opportunities for influencing Council decision-making go beyond stints of elected membership. It argues that the assumed centrality of the P5 on the Council thus needs to be qualified and re-evaluated.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)101-115
    Number of pages15
    JournalLeiden Journal of International Law
    Volume33
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Elected member influence in the United Nations Security Council'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this