Elective modernism and the politics of (bio)ethical expertise

Nathan Emmerich*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this essay I consider whether the political perspective of third wave science studies elective modernism offers a suitable framework for understanding the policy-making contributions that (bio)ethical experts might make. The question arises as a consequence of the fact that I have taken inspiration from the third wave in order to develop an account of (bio)ethical expertise. I offer a précis of this work and a brief summary of elective modernism before considering their relation. The view I set out suggests that elective modernism is a political philosophy and that although its use in relation to the use of scientific expertise in political and policy-making process has implications for the role of (bio)ethical expertise it does not, in the final analysis, provide an account that is appropriate for this latter form of specialist expertise. Nevertheless, it is an informative perspective, and one that can help us make sense of the political uses of (bio)ethical expertise
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPhilosophies and Sociologies of Bioethics
    Subtitle of host publicationCrossing the divides
    PublisherSpringer International Publishing Switzerland
    Pages23-40
    Number of pages18
    ISBN (Electronic)9783319927381
    ISBN (Print)9783319927374
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Jul 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Elective modernism and the politics of (bio)ethical expertise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this