TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrophysiological predictors of super-response to left bundle branch area pacing in nonischemic cardiomyopathy
T2 - The PRECISION LBBAP study
AU - Shroff, Jenish P.
AU - Chandh Raja, Deep
AU - Abhilash, Sreevilasam P.
AU - Mehta, Abhinav
AU - Abhayaratna, Walter P.
AU - Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
AU - Sanders, Prashanthan
AU - Pathak, Rajeev K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Heart Rhythm Society.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but variability in response remains poorly understood. Objective This study aimed to assess differences in cardiac activation between super-responders and partial responders to LBBAP and identify electrophysiological predictors of response using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging. Methods Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch (LBB) block (QRS >130 ms) who underwent LBBAP were enrolled. 10 super-responders (≥20% improvement in left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction) and 10 partial responders (<10% improvement) were matched 1:1. electrocardiographic imaging (CardioInsight, Medtronic) was performed during intrinsic rhythm (CRT-off) and during unipolar pacing (CRT-on) at 2 V and 0.4 ms. Changes in biventricular total activation time, LV activation time (LVtat), and ventricular electrical uncoupling were assessed. Results Compared with partial responders, super-responders exhibited significantly greater reductions in LVtat (mean difference 15.2 ms; 95% confidence interval 3.4-27.1; P =.015) and biventricular total activation time (29.0 [interquartile range IQR 22.0-39.8] vs 16.5 [IQR 3.0-27.0] ms; P =.045), alongside superior ventricular electrical uncoupling improvement (55.7% [IQR 39.0-67.0] vs 5.8% [IQR -18.0 to 35.5]; P =.014). Confirmed LBB capture was associated with substantially greater reduction in LVtat than LV septal capture (33.2 ± 10.4 ms vs 13.1 ± 9.9 ms; P <.001); consequently, an LVtat reduction of ≥26.86% predicted LBB capture with high accuracy (area under the curve 0.96; 83% sensitivity; 100% specificity). Confirmed LBB capture conferred 7.4-fold higher odds of super-response in Bayesian regression. Conclusion Super-response to CRT via LBBAP was associated with greater reductions in ventricular dyssynchrony. The presence of definitive LBB capture emerged as a strong predictor of super-response, emphasizing the mechanistic relevance of conduction system engagement for optimizing CRT outcomes.
AB - Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but variability in response remains poorly understood. Objective This study aimed to assess differences in cardiac activation between super-responders and partial responders to LBBAP and identify electrophysiological predictors of response using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging. Methods Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch (LBB) block (QRS >130 ms) who underwent LBBAP were enrolled. 10 super-responders (≥20% improvement in left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction) and 10 partial responders (<10% improvement) were matched 1:1. electrocardiographic imaging (CardioInsight, Medtronic) was performed during intrinsic rhythm (CRT-off) and during unipolar pacing (CRT-on) at 2 V and 0.4 ms. Changes in biventricular total activation time, LV activation time (LVtat), and ventricular electrical uncoupling were assessed. Results Compared with partial responders, super-responders exhibited significantly greater reductions in LVtat (mean difference 15.2 ms; 95% confidence interval 3.4-27.1; P =.015) and biventricular total activation time (29.0 [interquartile range IQR 22.0-39.8] vs 16.5 [IQR 3.0-27.0] ms; P =.045), alongside superior ventricular electrical uncoupling improvement (55.7% [IQR 39.0-67.0] vs 5.8% [IQR -18.0 to 35.5]; P =.014). Confirmed LBB capture was associated with substantially greater reduction in LVtat than LV septal capture (33.2 ± 10.4 ms vs 13.1 ± 9.9 ms; P <.001); consequently, an LVtat reduction of ≥26.86% predicted LBB capture with high accuracy (area under the curve 0.96; 83% sensitivity; 100% specificity). Confirmed LBB capture conferred 7.4-fold higher odds of super-response in Bayesian regression. Conclusion Super-response to CRT via LBBAP was associated with greater reductions in ventricular dyssynchrony. The presence of definitive LBB capture emerged as a strong predictor of super-response, emphasizing the mechanistic relevance of conduction system engagement for optimizing CRT outcomes.
KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy
KW - Electrocardiographic imaging
KW - Interventricular dyssynchrony
KW - Left bundle branch area pacing
KW - Left bundle branch pacing
KW - Left ventricular activation time
KW - Left ventricular septal pacing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105037754011
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.03.1908
DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.03.1908
M3 - Article
C2 - 41881370
AN - SCOPUS:105037754011
SN - 1547-5271
JO - Heart Rhythm
JF - Heart Rhythm
ER -