Abstract
John Rawls thinks republicanism is compatible with his political liberalism. Philip Pettit insists that the two conflict in important ways. In this paper, I make sense of this dispute by employing David Chalmers’s method of elimination to reveal the meaning underlying key terms in Rawls’s political liberalism and Pettit’s republicanism. This procedure of disambiguating terms will show how the two theories defend the same institutional arrangement on the same grounds. The procedure thus vindicates Rawls’s view of the two theories being compatible. The reason for this compatibility is that both theories are politicized—that is, they are constructed to attract the compliance of all reasonable members of a modern, pluralistic society.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 247-271 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Journal of Ethics |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2022 |