Elite Collusion in Indonesia: How It Has Both Enabled and Limited Executive Aggrandi­zement

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (SciVal)

    Abstract

    After a largely successful post­authoritarian transition, Indonesia has experienced democratic backsliding since the 2010s. this backsliding accelerated under the presidency of Joko Widodo (2014­2024), but it has not yet pushed the Indonesian polity into a full­blown autocracy. I argue that Indonesia’s specific pathway to democratic backsliding prefigured this outcome. While elites have colluded to share power and allow the president to engage in executive aggrandizement, they have set limits to the latter’s potential authoritar­ ian ambitions. For example, they rejected Widodo’s attempt to extend his time in power beyond the con­ stitutionally allowed two terms. thus, elites have both produced executive aggrandizement and contained its scope. this pattern has protected Indonesian democ­ racy from a full collapse, but it has produced a gradual decline, reducing the chances of democratic revitali­ zation through formal or contentious politics.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)223-234
    Number of pages12
    JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences
    Volume712
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2025

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Elite Collusion in Indonesia: How It Has Both Enabled and Limited Executive Aggrandi­zement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this